About Us

2025 uS Executive Orders, DEI, and Employment: how In-house Lawyers can help Business

Remind me, what’s an order?

Executive orders are directives bought by the president of the United States that direct federal government companies and officials to take particular actions. While they are not laws, they have the force of law and impact how existing laws are implemented or enforced.

Executive orders impact the firms of the executive branch and therefore do not require the approval of Congress. They must be within the president’s constitutional authority and might be challenged in court if deemed unconstitutional.

Executive orders might be rescinded, overturned by future presidents, or challenged in court, and enforcement priorities can alter during any administration.

The brand-new administration’s actions have far-reaching effects beyond executive orders. For more on mitigating danger, worldwide companies can seize new opportunities by staying active.

Implications of the executive orders for DEI efforts and work in private-sector organizations

On Jan. 21, President Trump released “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” which reverses different previous executive orders and memoranda, consisting of Executive Order 11246 (EO 11246) signed in 1965 by President Lyndon B. Johnson.

EO 11246 required every federal government contract to consist of a statement that the specialist will not victimize any worker or applicant for employment based upon race, creed, color, or employment nationwide origin.

Despite President Trump’s brand-new executive order, the underlying federal anti-discrimination law remains unchanged for private-sector workers.

However, the executive order signals that there might be changing enforcement concerns in the brand-new administration. The order directs all federal companies to “fight illegal private-sector DEI choices, requireds, policies, programs, and activities.”

In December 2024, President-elect Trump tapped Harmeet K. Dhillon to lead the Justice Department’s civil liberties workplace, indicating his record of “suing corporations who use ‘woke’ policies to victimize their workers.”

In addition to revoking EO 11246, the Jan. 21 executive order advises each agency of the federal government to determine “up to 9 possible civic compliance examinations” of personal sector employment entities within 120 days of the order – by May 21, employment 2025.

The private sector entities subject to these examinations consist of publicly traded corporations, large nonprofits – consisting of bar associations – big foundations, and universities whose endowments surpass US$ 1 billion.

Organizations that may be targeted should ask:

– What is my organization’s danger tolerance?

– How will workers react to the business’s actions?

– How will consumers and stakeholders respond?

What in-house counsel must think of:

Assess any federal contracts and grants

– Determine if they contain any terms or conditions connected to DEI that might clash with present laws and employment policies

Review your organization’s existing DEI policies to comprehend your danger

– Prepare for increased scrutiny and potential civil compliance investigations

Document, file, document

– Hiring and recruitment procedures

– Performance assessments and promotion decisions

– Training materials and employment participation records

– Any changes to DEI policies

Implications for federal contractors

To name a few measures, the Jan. 21 Executive Order needs the heads of federal companies to consist of particular terms in every agreement or grant award:

– “A term requiring the contractual counterparty or grant recipient to agree that its compliance in all aspects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is product to the federal government’s payment choices for purposes of section 3729( b)( 4) of title 31, United States Code”; and

– “A term needing such counterparty or recipient to license that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that break any relevant Federal anti-discrimination laws.”

Section 3729 of title 31 of the United States Code is a provision of the US False Claims Act, a federal law that imposes civil charges on those who make false claims to the federal government in order to influence the payment or receipt of cash or property.

The certification requirement brings a potential threat of litigation for federal professionals under the False Claims Act. In-house attorneys at federal contractors thus have a specific interest in guaranteeing their organization’s policies, treatments, practices, communications and content, are examined. Assess if modifications are required to alleviate the danger of lawsuits.

Executive orders targeting prohibited immigration

President Trump’s initial flurry of executive orders consisted of many – such as the Jan. 20 executive order “Protecting the American People Against Invasion” – targeted at restricting prohibited immigration and deporting prohibited immigrants. The orders require enforcement actions by federal agencies versus illegal immigration.

In-house attorneys ought to think about evaluating their company’s employment eligibility confirmation process. They may likewise want to think about whether the organization is gotten ready for reacting to an I-9 audit or a worksite enforcement action (or raid) by immigration enforcement agencies.

Sectors that might be especially impacted include agriculture, hospitality, and other markets such as construction. From 2020-2022, 42 percent of crop farmworkers held no work permission, according to the US Department of Agriculture. The American Immigration Council estimates that more than one million undocumented immigrants operate in hospitality, representing 7.1 percent of the workforce.

In-house counsel have an important role to play in establishing and ensuring constant application of the Form I-9 and E-Verify guidelines the federal government uses to carry out and impose migration law, shares John W. Mazzeo, AGC, director of I-9 and E-Verify compliance for Vertical Screen, Inc., in a 2024 ACC Docket post.

Take a look at useful checklists of factors to consider appropriate for in-house legal representatives on the topic of I-9 audits and worksite enforcement actions.

If an employer does not comply with a civil administrative warrant presented by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), there is a risk that the firm could start an I-9 audit if they felt an employer was blocking their need to detain a non-citizen worker, or in many cases acquire a criminal warrant from a judge if actions support it.

Steps in-house counsel must consider:

– Determine how lots of staff members could potentially be affected

– Review your organization’s employment eligibility verification procedure

– Ensure your company’s procedure is recorded and defensible

– Implement and implement clear policies

– Monitor legal advancements, employment including lawsuits and enforcement guidance

Mitigate threat, stay nimble, and seize brand-new opportunities

The recent executive orders will significantly impact worldwide companies. Legal departments and in-house counsel will require to assist their companies understand and adjust to changes, guaranteeing compliance or litigating when suitable.

A number of the brand-new administration’s choices will play out over the coming months, including new executive orders and legal difficulties. The Docket will continue to keep an eye on advancements. Global internal legal representatives ought to prepare for rapid developments associated with:

Trade and tariffs. On Feb. 1, President Trump bought the imposition of a 25-percent tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and 10-percent additional tariffs on imports from China. The former two were both postponed by a month as the administration engages in settlements. Meanwhile, China has started its own vindictive measures on US products. He had formerly announced his intent to impose 25-percent intensifying tariffs on Colombia (an action that was eventually not taken).

Technology and intellectual property. One of the president’s very first actions was to rescind the previous administration’s AI executive order. The new administration likewise extended a grace duration for TikTok’s upcoming restriction, sending waves throughout the innovation sector, both in the United States and abroad.

Energy, employment climate, and health. The president likewise withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization, putting an early focus on American energy independence and far from the previous administration’s global sustainability efforts.

Steps internal counsel ought to consider:

– Assess the impact of prospective tariff increases on supply chain and organization continuity.

– Assess the company’s dependency on social media platforms, such as for marketing purposes, and the possible requirements to backup social media information and assets in case their preferred platform stops to be available.

– Consider how developments in the new administration’s method to ecological, sustainability and governance issues may impact the company’s ESG technique.

Disclaimer: The information in any resource in this website should not be construed as legal guidance or as a legal opinion on particular truths, and need to not be considered representing the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not planned as a conclusive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, they are planned to serve as a tool supplying practical guidance and recommendations for the busy in-house professional and other readers.