About Us

Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren’t personally in presence, but the world-famous stars were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos – the controversial websites using both complimentary casino-style video games and profitable rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can ‘play for complimentary,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as conventional casinos, just without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t subject to regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company deals with allegations of prohibited gaming in a New york city suit that declares VGW uses star endorsers to ‘create a veneer of authenticity’ around its product. (See VGW’s declaration listed below)

‘I’m unsure” if you don’t trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of stars from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom use any differences in between conventional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many – however not all – video games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the capacity for actual gaming losses.

Others lure customers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement flaunting Drake’s vehicles, planes and mansions before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

‘Daddy, why do we have so much money?’ check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: ‘Because I never ever gave up.’

The inconsistency in between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for complimentary.

‘Most social sweeps clients never purchase,’ the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.’

Social casinos offer consumers a chance to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the option to purchase worthless currency typically referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be utilized to unlock numerous functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to acquire other currency called ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake’s automobiles, aircrafts and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but 7 states, which has helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need normally require identification. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit clients to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully particular guidelines. What’s more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, therefore providing a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of casino video games for a possibility to win – or lose – genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their bread and butter.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are simply a type of online entertainment,’ an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. ‘No purchase is required to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement – or” consideration” – is a crucial distinction in between social sweeps and standard online gaming websites like gambling establishments.’

Consider the method that McDonald’s uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to bet, however rather they’re buying hamburgers and french fries that use them the chance to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘consideration’, the game itself doesn’t satisfy the meaning of sports betting in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all sort of daily organizations in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,’ the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promos are frequently used by a who’s who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to many sports betting market experts, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald’s Monopoly game doesn’t run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, therefore suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They don’t last permanently and they’re normally not connected to casino-style games of opportunity,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re just money giveaways.

‘The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the attributes commonly associated with McDonald’s-style sweepstakes promos,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in eternity, the gambling establishments provide” casino-like” payouts, generally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payout percentage for a temporary marketing sweepstakes is a trivial share of the earnings made by the company [normally less than one percent]’

Wallach is quick to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, using clients the possibility to play casino-style games for real prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually given that been shuttered over claims of prohibited gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must deal with comparable analysis.

‘These distinctions are not arbitrary,’ Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. ‘They have actually consistently been cited by courts and state attorney generals as key consider identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in fact a guise for unlawful sports betting.’

One of the gambling establishment market’s leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

‘Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are forgoing considerable tax and earnings opportunities as this gaming replaces that carried out through regulated channels,’ checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current suit, which is largely similar to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an ‘unlawful gaming business. ‘

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as defendants in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business responded to DailyMail.com’s ask for remark.

‘We normally do not discuss matters before the courts,’ a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. ‘However, we note that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

‘We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and stay positive about the future,’ the representative continued. ‘We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, creating not only great video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to intensely protect any claim which might be brought against us.’

The concerns between standard online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos might prove troublesome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both back VGW’s Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting ‘sweeps’ sites while at the exact same time the leagues want to forecast a strong stance against prohibited gaming – especially when trying to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting supposedly unlawful sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,’ Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers’ agents responded to DailyMail.com’s requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to consumers the differences and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

‘We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our business practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘Some of our worths are” our players precede” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

‘Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who declare damage,’ Glaser said. ‘There is also some threat that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited gaming.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton